How much time do solo practitioners actually spend on intake?
Published 8 December 2025 · 5 min read
When we talk to solo practitioners about client intake, we often hear: "It doesn't take that long." But when we break down the actual process, the numbers are surprising.
Let's map a typical intake workflow.
The initial contact
A potential client emails or calls. You're with another client, so you don't respond immediately.
Time to triage and respond: 5-10 minutes
The back-and-forth to schedule an initial conversation might take 2-3 emails or a phone tag sequence.
Time to schedule: 10-15 minutes
The intake call
You conduct a phone or video call to understand their situation. For family law, this involves understanding the family structure, what's happened, what they want to achieve.
Time for intake call: 30-60 minutes
You take notes during the call, then spend time afterwards writing them up properly.
Time for notes: 10-15 minutes
Document collection
The potential client needs to send you documents. Existing court orders. Financial records. Identification.
You email them a list. They send some documents. You follow up about the missing ones.
Time for document management: 15-30 minutes (often spread across days)
Conflict check
You check the names against your existing clients and matters. For family law, this includes checking the other party and potentially other family members.
Time for conflict check: 5-10 minutes
Summary and decision
You review everything and decide whether to take the matter. You might send a follow-up email with engagement terms or a polite decline.
Time for summary and engagement: 10-20 minutes
The total
Add it up:
| Activity | Time |
|---|---|
| Triage and response | 5-10 min |
| Scheduling | 10-15 min |
| Intake call | 30-60 min |
| Notes | 10-15 min |
| Documents | 15-30 min |
| Conflict check | 5-10 min |
| Summary/engagement | 10-20 min |
| Total | 85-160 min |
For a typical matter, you're spending 1.5 to 2.5 hours on intake alone. And that doesn't include the potential client who takes your time but doesn't proceed.
If you take 10 new matters per month, that's 15-25 hours spent on intake. At average billing rates for mid-level solicitors ($350-550/hour), the opportunity cost is $5,000-14,000 monthly.
Where automation helps
Much of this time isn't legal work. It's administrative work that follows predictable patterns:
- Scheduling can be automated
- Initial information gathering can be conversational AI
- Document collection can be systematised
- Conflict checking can be automated
- Summary generation can be AI-assisted
Human judgment is essential for deciding whether to take a matter and how to approach it. But the administrative scaffolding around that decision? That's automation territory.
What changes with Jurisdox
With Jurisdox handling intake:
- Potential clients complete intake on your website at their convenience
- Information is collected through natural conversation
- Documents are gathered during the conversation
- Conflicts are checked automatically
- You receive a structured summary
Your time investment: 5-10 minutes to review the summary and make a decision.
The 1.5-2.5 hours becomes 10 minutes. Multiply by 10 matters per month, and you've recovered 15-25 hours.
That's a week of additional billable time every month. Or a week of life outside work. Your choice.
Interested in Jurisdox?
Join our early access waitlist and be among the first to experience AI-powered intake and document automation.
More articles
The December 2024 AI guidance: What it means for solo practitioners
In December 2024, the legal services regulators of NSW, Victoria, and Western Australia issued a joint statement providing guidance on artificial intelligence in legal practice. Here's what you need to know.
Why 53% of Australian law firms haven't adopted new legal tech
According to recent research, 53% of Australian law firms haven't adopted any new legal technology in five years. That's remarkable given how much the industry has changed. What's going on?
Comparing legal tech options for Australian solo practitioners in 2025
If you're an Australian solo practitioner evaluating legal technology, the options can feel overwhelming. This guide breaks down what's available and who each option suits best.